<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sher Law &#187; admin</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sherlaw.net/author/admin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sherlaw.net</link>
	<description>Sher Law is a real estate health care law firm in a Chicago suburb, Skokie, Illinois, with four attorneys.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 15:25:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Transitional Care Movement &#8211; Short Term Beds</title>
		<link>https://sherlaw.net/news/the-transitional-care-movement-short-term-beds/</link>
		<comments>https://sherlaw.net/news/the-transitional-care-movement-short-term-beds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 17:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherlaw.net/?p=879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month Transitional Care Management received State of Illinois approval to build two new short-term rehabilitation skilled nursing facilities in Lisle and Aurora, Illinois.  Shortly thereafter three local area nursing homes filed lawsuits against TCM to try and stop the construction of these buildings.  Based on the letters filed in opposition to the State of [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://sherlaw.net/news/the-transitional-care-movement-short-term-beds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medicaid Managed Care &#8211; Final CMS Rule 2390 and Nursing Home Pass-Thoughs</title>
		<link>https://sherlaw.net/news/medicaid-managed-care-final-cms-rule-2390-and-nursing-home-pass-thoughs/</link>
		<comments>https://sherlaw.net/news/medicaid-managed-care-final-cms-rule-2390-and-nursing-home-pass-thoughs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 19:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherlaw.net/?p=869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indiana currently receives Medicaid Supplemental Payments for nursing facilities that are operated by Non-State Government Owners that increase the amount of Medicaid payments to the Upper Payment Limit for participating providers, with the state portion funded by Intergovernmental Transfers.  Texas and Utah have similar programs while Oklahoma and Iowa are just two of the states [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://sherlaw.net/news/medicaid-managed-care-final-cms-rule-2390-and-nursing-home-pass-thoughs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare Supply and Demand Issues</title>
		<link>https://sherlaw.net/news/healthcare-supply-and-demand-issues/</link>
		<comments>https://sherlaw.net/news/healthcare-supply-and-demand-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherlaw.net/?p=818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update of 6/30/2016: The REITs have slowed their market activity in 2016 due to interest rate uncertainty, slumping share prices and concerns about the SNF market in general per the CBRE “Senior Housing Market Insight” report for the first quarter of 2016.  Per the report, traditionally REITs have represented the majority of transaction volume, but [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://sherlaw.net/news/healthcare-supply-and-demand-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transferring of Nursing Home Operations Upon Lease Termination</title>
		<link>https://sherlaw.net/news/transferring-of-nursing-home-operations-upon-lease-termination/</link>
		<comments>https://sherlaw.net/news/transferring-of-nursing-home-operations-upon-lease-termination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherlaw.net/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just a cautionary tale for lessee&#8217;s returning nursing homes to a lessor or new operator upon lease termination.  Earlier this month, a jury in Texas found that an affiliated tenant and subtenant of two nursing home facilities violated their leases and conspired to defraud the landlord before returning the facilities upon lease termination.  The [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://sherlaw.net/news/transferring-of-nursing-home-operations-upon-lease-termination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas QIPP Program</title>
		<link>https://sherlaw.net/news/texas-qipp-program-cms-issues/</link>
		<comments>https://sherlaw.net/news/texas-qipp-program-cms-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherlaw.net/?p=848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2014 the State of Texas established the Nursing Facility Minimum Payment Amounts Program (MPAP) to allow participating skilled nursing facilities with a source of Intergovernmental Transfers to receive additional funds equal to the difference between Medicare Part A and the amount they would have received under Medicaid.  MPAP became effective on March 1, 2015, but [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://sherlaw.net/news/texas-qipp-program-cms-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please don&#8217;t send me your wire transfer instructions in the body of an email.</title>
		<link>https://sherlaw.net/news/dont-send-me-your-wire-transfer-instructions-in-an-email/</link>
		<comments>https://sherlaw.net/news/dont-send-me-your-wire-transfer-instructions-in-an-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherlaw.net/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every day I send and receive hundreds of emails without considering the ease with which emails can be intercepted by clever hackers.  I doubt anyone has much use for the fifteen daily &#8220;Thank You&#8221; emails I receive or my snarky comments to Seller&#8217;s inexperienced general counsel on his draft purchase agreement; however, I recently learned that [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://sherlaw.net/news/dont-send-me-your-wire-transfer-instructions-in-an-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jaret Glazer</title>
		<link>https://sherlaw.net/news/jaret-glazer/</link>
		<comments>https://sherlaw.net/news/jaret-glazer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherlaw.net/?p=823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jaret is a new associate attorney at the firm.  His direct dial is 847-324-7993 and his email is jaret@sherlaw.net.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://sherlaw.net/news/jaret-glazer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elimination of the 1031 Exchange?</title>
		<link>https://sherlaw.net/news/elimination-of-the-1031-exchange/</link>
		<comments>https://sherlaw.net/news/elimination-of-the-1031-exchange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 16:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherlaw.net/?p=757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ninety-five years after inception, Congress is considering a repeal of Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.  In November of 2013, the Senate Finance Committee proposed a repeal of Section 1031, but left the door open for a more narrow view of exchanges.  In February, 2014, the House Ways and Means Committee released a draft [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://sherlaw.net/news/elimination-of-the-1031-exchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HUDs New Form of Intercreditor</title>
		<link>https://sherlaw.net/news/huds-new-form-of-intercreditor/</link>
		<comments>https://sherlaw.net/news/huds-new-form-of-intercreditor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherlaw.net/?p=728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As some of you may know, in April of last year, HUD released new forms of certain closing documents, including the AR Intercreditor Agreement.  Unfortunately, there were few AR lenders who would agree to enter into HUDs new form.  I personally know of only one lender who would sign the new form of the document [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://sherlaw.net/news/huds-new-form-of-intercreditor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re Crane Overturned</title>
		<link>https://sherlaw.net/news/in-re-crane-overturned/</link>
		<comments>https://sherlaw.net/news/in-re-crane-overturned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 22:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherlaw.net/?p=692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we described last year, the bankruptcy court in In re Crane held that a bankruptcy trustee could avoid two mortgages because the mortgages did not expressly state the interest rate and the maturity date.   This ruling turned upside down mortgage-industry standard practices and effectively required all Illinois mortgage to contain the maturity date and interest rate.  Then, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://sherlaw.net/news/in-re-crane-overturned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
